Stephen A Smith Drops a Booming Take Claims Jimmy Butler Can Replicate Prime Klay Thompson’s Impact with Steph Curry – Overrated or Game-Changing

Stephen A. Smith is never one to shy away from bold statements and controversial takes that shake the NBA world. His latest claim that Jimmy Butler could replicate the impact of prime Klay Thompson when playing alongside Steph Curry has sparked intense debate among fans and analysts. Is this a game-changing perspective on Butler’s capabilities or an overrated hot take that doesn’t hold weight? The idea of a two-way star like Butler fitting into the Golden State Warriors’ system in a Klay Thompson-type role is intriguing but also raises major basketball IQ and skill set concerns.

Breaking Down Klay Thompson’s Prime Impact

To understand this debate, it is crucial to revisit Klay Thompson’s prime years and his contributions to the Warriors dynasty. Three-time NBA champion Klay Thompson was more than just an elite three-point shooter. His ability to move without the ball, play elite perimeter defense, and score in catch-and-shoot situations made him the perfect second star next to Steph Curry. His record-breaking 60-point game on 11 dribbles and the unforgettable 37-point quarter illustrate just how deadly and efficient he was as a scorer.

Klay’s skill set allowed the Warriors’ offense to thrive with constant movement and spacing, which forced defenses to stretch and gave Curry more freedom. On the defensive end, Thompson’s ability to guard the opponent’s best perimeter player every night allowed Curry to conserve energy for his offensive game.

Could Jimmy Butler Replicate Klay’s Role?

Stephen A. Smith’s claim hinges on the belief that Jimmy Butler’s skill set could allow him to replicate Klay Thompson’s impact if he were to join Steph Curry. Butler is known for being an elite two-way player, capable of lockdown defense, mid-range scoring, and strong playmaking. His performances in the NBA playoffs, especially his 2023 Finals run with the Miami Heat, have earned him a reputation as one of the league’s most clutch players.

However, the biggest flaw in this argument is that Butler’s playing style is significantly different from Klay Thompson’s historic role. Klay is an off-ball sniper who thrives in catch-and-shoot situations, while Butler is a ball dominant player who prefers to operate in isolation and create shots off the dribble.

The Spacing and Shooting Problem

One of the main reasons Golden State’s system has been so successful is the elite shooting of both Steph Curry and Klay Thompson. Adding Butler to the mix instead of a sharpshooter like Klay could actually make Golden State’s offense less efficient. Butler is a career 32 percent three-point shooter, significantly lower than Klay’s near 42 percent career average from beyond the arc. This lack of elite perimeter shooting would limit Curry’s spacing, allowing defenses to clog the paint and force tougher shots.

Additionally, Butler’s mid-range heavy offensive game would not seamlessly fit into the Warriors’ motion offense, which relies on quick ball movement, off-ball screens, and constant cutting. Butler thrives in slower offensive sets where he can dictate the tempo, but the Warriors’ system is fast-paced and fluid, requiring quick decision-making and instantaneous shot releases.

Defensive Impact Comparison

Defensively, there is a strong argument that Butler could match or even exceed Klay’s impact. He is a tough, physical defender who can guard multiple positions and brings an intensity that elevates his teammates. However, what made Klay unique was his ability to play elite defense while not requiring the ball on offense. Butler needs touches to be effective, which could take away from Curry’s offensive production rather than enhance it.

Would Butler thrive with Steph Curry?

While Butler is a superstar in his own right, his game is built on isolation scoring and playmaking, making it difficult to see how he could replicate Klay’s role effectively. If Butler were to play alongside Stephen Curry, it would require a major adjustment to his offensive approach, including becoming more of a catch-and-shoot player and moving without the ball—things that do not align with his strengths.

Instead of filling Klay Thompson’s role, Butler’s presence would likely lead to a completely different offensive scheme that could work but would not replicate the same formula that led to the Warriors’ championship success.

Overrated Take or Game-Changer?

Stephen A. Smith’s bold take that Jimmy Butler could replicate Klay Thompson’s impact alongside Steph Curry may generate headlines and debate, but in reality, it does not hold up under scrutiny. While Butler’s defense, leadership, and toughness could bring value to any team, his offensive playing style does not align with what made Klay Thompson so effective next to Curry.

In the end, this take feels overrated rather than game-changing. Butler is a phenomenal player, but expecting him to fill Klay Thompson’s exact role in Golden State’s unique system would be an unrealistic basketball experiment.

Dallas Mavericks head coach Jason Kidd is no stranger to making controversial statements, but his recent comparison between Klay Thompson and Mavericks players has ignited backlash from fans. Kidd suggested that Klay’s current level of play may not be as impactful as it once was, sparking intense debates about whether Thompson is declining or if he still holds value as an elite shooter.

What Did Jason Kidd Say?

During a press conference, Jason Kidd addressed the Mavericks’ roster construction, particularly discussing the team’s need for perimeter shooting. In doing so, he made a remark about Klay Thompson, implying that the Golden State sharpshooter is no longer the same dominant force he once was.

This statement did not sit well with Mavericks fans, many of whom believe that Thompson would still be a valuable addition to any team, including the Mavericks.

Is Klay Thompson really declining?

While Thompson’s numbers have dipped slightly in the last couple of seasons, it is essential to recognize that he remains a deadly shooter with championship experience. His ability to knock down three-pointers at an elite level and perform in high-pressure moments still makes him a valuable asset.

However, age and injuries have slightly impacted his defensive abilities, making him less of a two-way threat than in his prime years.

Why Mavericks Fans Are Upset

Mavericks fans took offense to Kidd’s comments for several reasons. First, many feel that Dallas could actually benefit from a player like Klay Thompson, who could provide elite floor spacing and complement Luka Dončić and Kyrie Irving.

Second, Kidd’s remarks suggest that he undervalues elite shooting, something that Dallas has struggled with over the years.

Could Klay Fit in Dallas?

‘

If the Mavericks were to pursue Klay Thompson, he would immediately become one of their most dangerous shooters. His off-ball movement and ability to play in a catch-and-shoot role would relieve pressure from Luka and Kyrie, making their offensive game even more lethal.

Jason Kidd’s comments about Klay Thompson have not only angered Mavericks fans but have also reignited discussions about Thompson’s current value in the league. While he may not be the two-way force he once was, he remains an elite shooter who could still make a significant impact on any contending team, including the Dallas Mavericks.